Search Site
Menu

False Claims Act Litigation May Have ‘Seismic Impact’ at Supreme Court

False Claims Act litigation may have significant impact this year, as the Supreme Court decides which cases to hear. The Supreme Court has already accepted one False Claims Act case, and appears to be seriously considering another. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice has been sinking FCA lawsuits at “an unprecedented pace.” How will that affect future FCA litigation, nationwide?

Here are two FCA cases to watch.

The Department of Justice’s authority to end FCA suits

One of the biggest FCA controversies comes from the Department of Justice’s ability and authority to end FCA litigation, over the objections of whistleblower plaintiffs. In recent years, the DOJ has begun ending FCA lawsuits, which often include Medicare and Medicaid billing, at a faster rate than ever before. This has resulted in the Supreme Court taking on Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, which will determine the extent of the DOJ’s discretion when it comes to dismissing suits.

Some lawyers expect that the Supreme Court will decline to curtail the DOJ’s discretionary powers, which would indicate a lesser practical impact on False Claims Act litigation.

In the meantime, another FCA case is gaining momentum. U.S. ex rel. Schutte et al. v. SuperValu Inc. et al. involves the Seventh Circuit’s ruling on whether a grocery/pharmacy chain, SuperValu, had an “objectively reasonable” interpretation of regulations. The Seventh Circuit wrote that there “wouldn’t be liability even if SuperValu never believed its interpretation was correct and had been told by its lawyers that another interpretation was better,” and therefore FCA liability is not permissible. The case is currently before the Supreme Court, and will primarily affect companies who bill Medicaid and Medicare.

While the government has not formally intervened in the case, justices have sought input from the government, and the U.S. solicitor general urged the high court to review the case. This typically indicates the court will hear the case. If so, it’s expected to impact inconsistent state and federal Medicaid and Medicare billing regulations.

If you have a whistleblower claim, a knowledgeable whistleblower attorney at Kardell Law Group can help. Call today to learn more.

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.