Search Site
Menu

Gag Orders at Federal Agencies Violate Whistleblower Laws

Over the last year and a half, there have been numerous reports about employees of federal agencies not being allowed to use specific words when preparing documents for Congress or when putting together reports. For example, in December, The Washington Post reported the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended employees not use words like “diversity” or “entitlement.”

However, federal law prohibits government agencies from putting restrictions on employees’ free speech without clarifying that those restrictions do not remove their right to report any internal wrongdoing. Government agencies have simply not been giving those laws the proper attention, failing to emphasize whistleblower protections.

However, after a request by various organizations, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), an agency enforcing the free speech rights of government employees, began an investigation into the gag orders issued by the Department of Health and Human Services since January 2017.

The OSC reported that while the CDC policy was technically not a legal violation, its staff were instructed to avoid using certain words and as such may at least believe their rights to act as whistleblowers have been infringed upon.

The OSC’s investigation did also indicate that HHS did explicitly violate the Whistleblower Protection and Enhancement Act in the use of three other gag orders since January 2017, including its bans on unapproved communications with the media and members of Congress.

HHS and the Justice Department, which was also found to be in violation of various whistleblower laws, agreed to rewrite these policies and email employees to explain their rights.

Whistleblowers must be protected

The federal government has done a tremendous job over the last decade of strengthening whistleblower protections and encouraging people, especially employees of government agencies, to come forward with information when they become aware of internal wrongdoing. The OSC’s investigation was important in that it ensured whistleblowers still have the same rights they have had for several years now, even if government agencies are implementing unfair gag orders.

For more information on how to file a whistleblower claim, speak with an knowledgeable Dallas attorney at Kardell Law Group.

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.