Common Issues for Businesses in HR Investigations

4514 Cole Ave, #600 | Dallas, Texas 75205

Call Kardell Law Group 214-306-8045

The timeliness and efficiency of internal investigations performed by human resources professionals are crucial to help companies act appropriately when they face allegations of wrongdoing. In addition, establishing an efficient and fair internal complaint resolution process will make it much more likely that employees will come forward with information on potential wrongdoing when they have it, rather than allowing the matter to worsen or reporting it elsewhere.

Below are some of the most common problems or issues businesses tend to have with their HR investigations:

Insufficient planning: Every investigation should begin with some thorough planning of how you’ll proceed. It can be tempting to spring to action when reports come through, and yes, time is of the essence. But it is also crucial to be prudent with the methods used in investigating a claim. Consider who will be interviewed, who will do the interviewing, what you need to know and how you can protect the confidentiality of the process.
Insufficient documentation: Document everything when performing internal investigations. Take notes on all meetings and interactions, collect names of witnesses, and document write-ups when you take action.
Difficult witnesses: If you have witnesses who are hesitant to cooperate with your investigation, this could make matters difficult for your company. Make sure the witness knows that it is crucial for the health of your company to get all the information on a matter. Be reasonable in the steps you take to attempt to get them to cooperate, but still take charge when interviewing.
Delineation of responsibilities: It’s a good idea to separate the fact finders from the decision makers. If you run a company, have your HR person conduct the investigation and present their findings to you, allowing you to make the decision you feel best suits your company.
Protecting confidentiality: Keep everything on a need-to-know basis as part of your investigation, While you cannot promise complete confidentiality, you can at least ensure that information on the investigation will not get out to people who do not need to know all the details. You can tell a witness their identity will not be revealed unless absolutely necessary, and that you will inform them if that changes.

For tips and guidance on running more effective internal investigations, speak with a skilled whistleblower attorney at Kardell Law Group.

By Steve Kardell | Published August 22, 2019 | Posted in Whistleblower Litigation | Tagged efficient and fair, internal investigations, the most common problems or issues, whistleblower, whistleblower attorney

Awards & Honors

Our Office

Dallas Office
4514 Cole Ave
#600
Dallas, Texas 75205
Phone: 214-306-8045
Fax: 469-729-9926

Testimonials

"Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission." -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower
"Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone." -V.B.
"Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them." -KS
"Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best." -S.S.